Pollution Prevention and Control Technologies
for Plating Operations
Section 2 - General Waste Reduction Practices
2.3 GOOD OPERATING PRACTICES
2.3.2 Chemical Tracking and Record Keeping
The major sources of pollution from plating operations are process
chemicals. Process chemicals become pollution through both use
and misuse, resulting in wastewater generation, spills/leaks,
spent solutions, sludge and air emissions. To be fully effective,
a pollution prevention and control program must track and record
chemical purchases, chemical use, and waste generation. The following
is a list of chemical and waste data that merit consideration
for record keeping:
- Chemical purchases
- Chemical inventory
- Bath analyses (see Section 2.3.3)
- Process (tank) reformulations and chemical additions
- Partial tank discharges (i.e., decanting) and total tank discharges
(i.e., batch dumps)
- Water use per rinse tank or plating line (see Section 2.5.2.6)
- Total wastewater flow
- Wastewater treatment chemical use
- Spent process solution analyses
- Waste treatment sludge analyses
- Waste location
To increase the utility of the chemical use and waste generation
data, corresponding production data should also be collected and
recorded. These data can be used to identify decreases or increases
in chemical use and waste generation that are due to production
changes rather than operational practices.
The chemical data can also be used to develop material balances
for individual processes, a sequence of processes or an entire
facility. A material balance, which is often shown as a block
diagram, indicates the material inputs and outputs for the selected
operation. Creating a material balance for a process such as chromium
plating forces one to consider the various chemical inputs and
losses such as chromic acid additions, emissions, drag-out, chromium
plated onto parts, bath maintenance losses, etc. A material balance
for chromium use at the Tinker AFB plating shop is shown in Exhibit
2-8.
Several questions in the Users Survey were related to chemical
tracking and record keeping. These include questions 4, 6 and
7 of Exhibit 2-6 and question 8 of Exhibit 2-16. The response
to question 4 showed that 207 shops (or 65.1%) have instituted
strict chemical inventory control. The response to questions 6
and 7 indicate that 393 shops (or 92.1%) perform routine bath
analysis and 273 shops (or 85.8%) maintain bath analyses and/or
tank addition logs. The response to question 4 (Exhibit 2-16)
indicates that 37 shops (or 11.6%) use water flow meters and/or
accumulators to track fresh water use at each tank or plating
line. Of these various pollution prevention options, the use of
routine bath analyses and maintaining logs had the highest success
ratings (4.37 and 4.35 respectively).
Next Section|Main Table of Contents|Section 2