Pollution Prevention and Control Technologies for Plating
Operations
Section 5 - Substitute Technologies
5.5 CADMIUM USE REDUCTION/ELIMINATION
Cadmium, which is most often plated from a cyanide solution, was
identified by the respondents of the Users Survey to be of significant
concern. At the time of the survey, 30 percent of the respondents
performed cadmium plating using a cyanide bath and 2 percent used
a non-cyanide bath. Ten percent of all respondents indicated that
they have compliance difficulty with cadmium. Seventeen percent
indicated that they felt there was a technology transfer insufficiency
with respect to cadmium and 8 percent indicated that there was
a need for better cadmium alternatives or control technologies.
Based on the results of the Users Survey, it is obvious that cadmium-cyanide
plating is much more difficult to substitute for than cyanide-based
plating in general (see Exhibit 5-5). Only 8 of the respondents
(or approximately 8% of the cadmium platers) have successfully
made this substitution, with another 8 (or approximately 8% of
the cadmium platers) indicating partial success. Another 3 respondents
(or approximately 3% of the cadmium platers) have successfully
implemented a low-cyanide, low-cadmium substitute. No single cadmium
substitute stood out as the most successful, with tin and tin
alloys, zinc (non-cyanide), cobalt-zinc and zinc-iron being used.
The primary problems with cadmium substitutes were: (1) customer
acceptance; (2) the quality of the finish; and (3) their higher
cost.
In addition to the plating shops that indicated they have substituted
non-cadmium or low-cadmium processes for a conventional cadmium
process, there were ten shops that indicated they have eliminated
cadmium plating in order to meet environmental regulations.
Next Section|Main Table of Contents|Section 5