SEP 25 1986
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Repromulgation of F006 Hazardous Waste Category
FROM: J. Winston Porter
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response
TO Valdas V. Adamkus
Regional Administrator
Thank you for your August 18, 1986 memorandum regarding the repromulgation
of the F006 hazardous waste category.
After a briefing with the staff from the Office of Solid Waste,
Office of General Counsel, and the Office of Waste Programs Enforcement
(OWPE), I decided to re-interpret the F006 listing to only include
those processes that can be implicated, either directly or indirectly,
in the language of the listing. During this briefing, I was presented
with five options which are described in the attached material.
I selected option three because it provides a sound legal argument
and is cost effective--it saves resources. Realizing that option
three may create problems with existing enforcement actions involving
F006 wastes, I have requested OWPE to develop guidance which you
should find helpful. In addition, we expect to re-visit the scope
of the F--6 listing as part of our relisting effort.
The details of the decision are as follows: the F006 listing would
include wastewater treatment sludges from the following processes:
(1) common and precious metals electroplating, (2) anodizing (3)
chemical etching and milling and (4) cleaning and shipping associated
with common and precious metal electroplating. The following processes
are not included under the F006 listing: (1) chemical conversion
coating, (2) electroless plating, (3) printed circuit board manufacturing
and (4) the six processes explicitly excluded from F006. Let me
elaborate two fine points regarding the processes that are not
listed. First, wastewater treatment sludges from the chemical
conversion coating of aluminum are listed as EPA hazardous waste
No. F019. Second, wastewater treatment sludges from printed circuit
board manufacturing operations that include processes which are
within the scope of the listing (i.e. chemical etching) are listed
as EPA hazardous waste No. F006.
We have drafted a Federal Register notice which presents our re-interpretation
of the F006 listing. This notice has been forwarded to the Regions
for comment. In addition, a meeting was held with the Regions
in Atlanta on September 16, 1986 to discuss our approach.
I hope this memorandum and the attached briefing material explains
how I made my decision and how I plan to proceed. If I can be
of further assistance, please let me know.
Attachment
_