UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APR 6 1988
R. Todd Grant
President
Tomar Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 233
Wexford, PA 15090
Dear Mr. Grant:
This is in response to your letter of March 14, 1988, to Michael
Petruska, concerning the recycling of nickel, copper, and chromium-containing
electroplating sludges. This is a complex area of regulation,
and you may have misunderstood some of what Mr. Petruska explained
in your March 2 meeting. My understanding of your operation is
that you plan to recycle electroplating sludges by recovering
certain metal values from dried material produced from sludge
dryers. The two key questions in determining RCRA applicability
are: (1) whether the sludge is listed in 40 CFR Part 261, Subpart
D, and (2) whether the material is processed before use, i.e.,
"reclaimed".
Although the material will be fed to a metal smelting furnace,
please note that such smelters are considered reclamation devices,
and therefore the exclusions for direct use or reuse at 40 CFR
Section 261.2(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii) do not apply. (See 50 FR
633; January 4, 198.) Listed sludges that are reclaimed are solid
waste, while sludges that are hazardous only because they exhibit
a characteristic are not solid waste when reclaimed. Since electroplating
sludges are specifically listed wastes, these wastes when reclaimed
(i.e., processed in a metal smelting furnace) are subject to the
hazardous waste rules. In particular, the generator and transporter
rules apply when the material is shipped (40 CFR Parts 262 and
263) and the reclamation facility is subject to 40 CFR Section
261.6(c). Also, EPA has proposed rules for industrial furnaces
in 40 CFR Part 266, Subpart D. (See 52 FR 16982; May 6, 1987.)
The dried material you plan to market to smelters would be considered
a partially-reclaimed material, because further processing is
required before the metal can actually be used. If you believe
the material is commodity-like after drying, you may petition
the Agency for a variance. (See 40 CFR Sections 260.30(c), and
260.31(c).) Under these provisions, the EPA Regional Administrator
(or, in an authorized State, the Director of the State's RCRA
program) with jurisdiction over the facility producing the material
may grant a variance from classification of the material as solid
waste.1/ The factors that are relevant in granting the variance
are in Section 260.31(c), and are discussed at 50 FR 655 (January
4, 1985).
In summary, the process you describe would be subject to the RCRA
hazardous waste regulations if listed sludges are reclaimed. If
you seek a variance for the partially-reclaimed material, you
should contact the appropriate EPA Region or State agency. Finally,
I suggest you modify your certificate because the material would
be, as EPA defines the term, "reclaimed".
If you have further questions in this area, please continue to
deal with Mr. Petruska at (202) 475-9888.
Sincerely,
Sylvia K. Lowrance, Director
Office of Solid Waste
1/ The variance is only necessary for listed sludges. As noted
above, characteristic-only sludges are not solid waste when reclaimed.