Presented in Partnership with:
 
 

1989

RCRA/SUPERFUND HOTLINE MONTHLY SUMMARY

AUGUST 89

Clarification of Electroplating Listings

The background document which supported the listing of F006 initially included electroless plating within the scope of the definition of electroplating. However, the December 2, 1986 Federal Register (54 FR 43351) clarified EPAs interpretation of the definition of electroplating as it pertained to the F006 listing. The clarification states that electroless plating was not considered an electroplating process. Would electroless plating baths which contain small concentrations of cyanide meet the F007 listing when disposed?

No. Although the December 2, 1986, clarification was written specifically for the F006 listing, the definition of electroplating may be applied analogously to the F007, F008 and F009 listings. Therefore,

plating bath solutions from electroless plating operations will not meet the F007 listing when disposed. The bath would be regulated, however, if it exhibited one or more of the characteristics of hazardous waste.

Source: David Topping (202) 382-7737

Research: Kent Morey

_

 

| Home | Subscribe | Regulations | Compliance Assistance | News | Resources | Resource Locators | Directories | Online Training | About | Search | NASF.org |


The information contained in this site is provided for your review and convenience. It is not intended to provide legal advice with respect to any federal, state, or local regulation.
You should consult with legal counsel and appropriate authorities before interpreting any regulations or undertaking any specific course of action.

Please note that many of the regulatory discussions on STERC refer to federal regulations. In many cases, states or local governments have promulgated relevant rules and standards
that are different and/or more stringent than the federal regulations. Therefore, to assure full compliance, you should investigate and comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulations.