 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||
EPA Regulatory Determinations
Search EPA Regulatory Determinations by Keyword
Determinations Specific to Metal Finishing
2004
- Frequently Asked Questions about Satellite Accumulation Areas
- Applicability of the F006 classification to wastes from the chemical etching of magnesium.
2001
2000
- May a major source subject to the Halogenated Solvent MACT and the chromium electroplating MACT remove its halogenated solvent source after the compliance date for these standards, become an area source, and thus be exempted from Title V permitting?
- If a major source of hazardous air pollutants is subject to the Halogenated Solvent NESHAP and the chromium electroplating NESHAP, can it take potential to emit restrictions after the compliance dates for these standards and become an area source and therefore defer Title V permitting?
1999
- Will EPA require a facility to conduct another performance test for the hard chromium electroplating operation while operating a 12,000 amperage rectifier given that an initial performance test was conducted while operating a 6,000 amperage rectifier?
- Request for Approval of an Alternative Compliance Test Method for Two Hard Chromium Plating Tanks
1998
- Is the Thin Dense Chrome Plating process considered a hard or decorative chromium electroplating process?
- Preval Spray Units Applicability to the Aerospace NESHAP
- CARB Method for Chrome NESHAP
- Determination of Sampling Time for Affected and Nonaffected Sources at Large Hard Chromium Electroplating Facilities
- Approval of an Alternative Test Method to Demonstrate Compliance With Chrome Plating NESHAP
- Review of Performance Data Demonstrating Compliance With the Chrome Plating NESHAP
- Alternative to Method 306B (40 CFR 63, Appendix A) for Measuring Surface Tension in a Chrome Plating Tank
- Clarification of Chrome Plating NESHAP 40 C.F.R. ยง 63.343(c)(5)
- Halogenated Solvent Cleaning Machine NESHAP
- Source Testing Requirements for Some Hard Chrome Platers That Use Fume Suppressants
1997
- Are chrome strip tanks subject to the chromium electroplating and anodizing rule?
- Comment on Section 6.0 of Method 306A
- Surface Tension Limit, Clarification of Chrome Plating NESHAP
- Proposed Relocation of Equipment Subject to Chromium NESHAP
- Tank Applicability to Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing NESHAP
- Classification of Two Chrome Strip Tanks Under Chromium NESHAP
- Initial Performance Testing Required Under Chromium NESHAP
- Various Issues Concerning Testing Under the Chromium Neshap
- Compliance Status Reports for the Chromium Electroplating MACT
- Issues Regarding Shutdown Units Under the Chromium Electroplating MACT Standard
1996
- Interpretation Regarding Printed Wiring Board Silk Screening
- Trigger processes for determining rule applicability
- Use of Wetting Agents in Trivalent Chromium Baths
- Approval of Compliance Monitoring and Work Practice Standards for a Non-Listed Air Pollution Device Under Chrome Plating NESHAP.
- Applicability Determination Request for Chromium Electroplating Standard, LTV Steel
- Applicability Determination Request for Chromium Electroplating Standard, National Steel
- Applicability Determination Request Chromium Electroplating Standard for U.S. Steel's Gary, Indiana facility
- Chromium Electroplating Emission Standard Compliance Extension Request, Hastings Manufacturing Corp.
- Chromium MACT Compliance Extension Moyno Industrial Products, Springfield, Ohio
- Chromium Electroplating Emission Standard: Compliance Extension Request, SPX Corp.
- Is a Chromating or Chromate Conversion Coating Process Subject to the Chrome Plating NESHAP?
- Is a Passivation Process Subject to the Chrome Plating NESHAP?
- Merlin Control Device and the Chrome Plating NESHAP
1995
- Definitions Related to Implementation of 40 CFR 433
- Applicability of 40 CFR 433 to Federal Contractors
- Classification of Engraving Process
- Applicability of 40 CFR 433 when Core Operation is Closed-Loop
- Applicability of 40 CFR 413 and 433 to Bench-Scale Etching of Metallographic Samples
- Chromium Electroplating Emission Standard: Compliance Extension Request
- Chromium emissions from tanks with Merlin devices
- Chromium emissions from tanks with Merlin devices (2)
- Chromium conversion coating of <=1 micron in PWB operation
- Applicability of 40 CFR, Subpart N, to a specific steel coil Cr plating operation
- General applicability of 40 CFR, Subpart N to continuous steel coil plating operations
- Is a specific potassium dichromate plating operation covered by the new Cr regulation?
- NSPS Subpart EE determination concerning organic coating of steel furniture
1994
- Industrial Wipers and Shop Towels
- Definition of Spent Material
- Clarification of the RCRA regulations as they apply to certain secondary materials
- Classification of Sludge from the Revised "Zinc Cobalt Alloy Plating on Carbon Steel" Process
- Photoresist solids ("skins") generated in the printed circuit board manufacturing industry
- Applicability of F006 Code to Nickel Reclamation Process for Electroless Nickel Spent Solutions
- Waste in Satellite Accumulation Areas
- Elementary Neutralization Units Generating and Storing Non-Corrosive Hazardous Wastes
- LASER EX chemical polishing system
1993
- Closed-Loop Recycling Exclusion
- Cr reoxidation, TCLP, and CN Analytical Methods
- Clarification of the term "aqueous"
- Definition and Recycling of Non-Listed Commercial Chemical Products
- EPA Determination: Recycling Regulations Under RCRA
- Solder Dross and Solder Pot Dumps
- Revisions to the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)
- Solder Dross and Solder Pot Dumps defined as Scrap Metal
- Metal Particles from Buffing Operation
1990
- Does the replacement of the water quench system and the prime oven constitute reconstruction?
- How is reconstruction defined?
- Is a facility that coats refrigerator panels, but doesn't assemble them, subject to NSPS Subpart SS?
1989
1988
- Are contact adhesives subject to Subpart EE?
- Are rinsewaters generated by electroplating operations regulated as hazardous wastes under RCRA?
- Recycling of nickel, copper, and chromium-containing electroplating sludges
- Bronze plating process which plates a copper-tin alloy
- Certain hazardous waste definitions
- Subpart TT regulate VOCs emitted or applied?
1986
- Interpretation of the electroplating listings (EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F006 and F019)
- Classification of sludge generated from treatment of cleaner solutions
- Mechanical plating system is not an electroplating operation
- Repromulgation of the F006 hazardous waste
- Interpretation of the hazardous waste listing for F006 wastes
- Spent pickle liquor final rule correction
1985
- Does lime-stabilized waste pickle liquor sludge (LSWPLS) qualify for exclusion
- Spent pickle liquor as a hazardous waste
- Use/reuse exclusion as it relates to spent pickle liquor that is used as a wastewater conditioner
- Is an Iron/manganese/phosphate operation to provide lubrication an electroplating process?
1984
- Inquiry regarding the status of supernatant from lime treatment of spent pickle liquor
- Clarification of K062 - spent pickle liquor listing
- Regulatory status of spent acid from electropolishing of stainless steel
- Status of wastewater treatment sludges generated from zinc plating on carbon steel
- Clarification of lime-stabilized waste pickle liquor sludge (LSWPLS) from the iron and steel industry
- Etching silicon wafers in operation not associated with PWB manufacture
- Zinc plating (segregated basis) on carbon steel, phosphating